10+ Top Blockchain Development Companies for Best Value and Cost
As organizations adopt blockchain for finance, supply chain, healthcare, identity, gaming, and enterprise automation, the demand for top blockchain development companies continues to rise. But the truth is: Not all blockchain vendors are equal. Some excel at enterprise-grade security, others focus on DeFi, Web3, tokenization, or consortium-based private blockchain solutions. And choosing the wrong partner can result in high costs, slow delivery, or a platform that cannot scale. This guide helps you identify the top 10+ blockchain development companies that offer the best value, cost efficiency, and technical depth—backed by real insights into each company’s platforms, strengths, and suitability.
How did we have this list of best blockchain development companies?
Selecting the top 10+ blockchain development companies requires more than checking portfolios. Many firms claim expertise, but only a few combine technical skills, proven experience, and the ability to deliver stable blockchain solutions within the right cost range. The list below comes from a structured evaluation based on public industry data, service quality, client outcomes, and technical depth.
We reviewed more than 80 companies worldwide. Each vendor was examined through a consistent set of criteria to understand their strengths, limitations, pricing, and market positioning. We also assessed their ability to support different industries and blockchain platforms.
The goal is simple: provide a reliable and intuitive overview so businesses can select the right vendor without spending weeks in research.
Key criteria used to build this list:
- Verified experience delivering blockchain development services
- Experience with multiple blockchain platforms including Ethereum, Hyperledger, Solana, and others
- Client feedback on Clutch, GoodFirms, and enterprise references
- Pricing transparency and reasonable cost ranges
- Technical team size and scalability
- Security practices and audit capabilities
- Ability to work with startups, SMEs, and enterprises
- Stability, years in the market, and engineering maturity
- Strength in smart contracts, tokenization, and DApp ecosystems
Top 10+ Best Blockchain Development Companies for Your Project
Blockchain development providers differ widely in size, price, capability, and specialization. Some excel in enterprise-grade systems, while others focus on fast MVPs or Web3 protocols. This section walks through each company clearly. Before describing each company in detail, you will find a short bullet summary to help you compare quickly.
Below are the 10+ top blockchain development companies that offer the best value, technical strength, and balanced cost:
1. Antier Solutions
- Location: US, India, UAE
- Established: 2016
- Employees: 200+
- Core Strength (Blockchain Platforms): Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Hyperledger Fabric, Polkadot
- Cost: 40 to 80 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Startups, SMEs, fast-scaling blockchain products
- Flexibility: High. Supports custom, end-to-end development.
Antier Solutions is well known for its broad blockchain delivery capacity. The company supports ICO development, DeFi platforms, NFT marketplaces, wallets, and enterprise blockchain. Their global presence helps them maintain competitive pricing while still offering full-cycle services. The team is also strong in UI UX, integrations, and product engineering.
They focus on building scalable Web3 ecosystems and fast MVP delivery. Their blockchain development services include everything from token development and audits to enterprise-grade architecture. Antier’s core value lies in fast execution, strong communication, and reliable post-launch support.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Broad service offerings | Not ideal for very large enterprise systems |
| Competitive pricing | Costs may still be high for early-stage startups |
| Strong global presence | Regional time zone differences can affect some projects |
| Fast delivery cycles | Limited protocol-level innovation |
2. ConsenSys
- Location: Brooklyn, NY, USA
- Established: 2014
- Employees: 1,000+
- Core Strength: Ethereum ecosystem, Layer 2, Polygon, Quorum
- Cost: 120 to 250 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Enterprises, financial institutions, government projects
- Flexibility: Moderate. Enterprise-focused.
ConsenSys is one of the biggest names in blockchain. As a key contributor to the Ethereum ecosystem, they offer unmatched credibility for enterprise Ethereum projects. Their suite of products includes Infura, MetaMask, Truffle, and Quorum. Many global companies rely on ConsenSys for decentralized applications, digital identity, and compliance-grade smart contracts.
Their biggest strength is deep technical R&D. ConsenSys teams work directly with core Ethereum improvements and security standards. For complex, large-scale blockchain systems, few companies match their capabilities.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Leading Ethereum authority | High cost |
| Enterprise-level tools and frameworks | Slow onboarding for smaller clients |
| Strong compliance and security | Not ideal for startups |
| Highly advanced R&D | Focused mainly on Ethereum only |
3. Markovate
- Location: India
- Established: ~2017
- Employees: 100+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, Corda
- Cost: 25 to 45 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Startups and SMEs needing fast MVPs
- Flexibility: High.
Markovate focuses on smart contracts, blockchain integration, and industry use cases such as supply chain, finance, and healthcare. The company offers cost-effective development, making it attractive for businesses with limited budgets that still need reliable blockchain delivery.
Their development style is agile and collaborative, with emphasis on clarity and fast iteration. Markovate is suitable for businesses that want custom solutions but do not require complex infrastructure or large cross-department systems.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Cost-effective pricing | Smaller scale |
| Strong SME focus | Limited global presence |
| Good project communication | Not ideal for advanced blockchain R&D |
| Flexible delivery | Less experience with large enterprises |
4. Innovecs
- Location: US, Ukraine
- Established: 2011
- Employees: 1,000+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Hyperledger, EOS, Corda
- Cost: 45 to 90 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Enterprises, cross-industry digital programs
- Flexibility: Moderate.
Innovecs brings a wide technology portfolio combining AI, IoT, and blockchain. The company is notable for large-scale enterprise blockchain development and strong engineering capacity. They support long-term digital transformation programs and private blockchain networks.
Their advantage is the ability to integrate blockchain with analytics, automation, and enterprise systems. This makes them suitable for companies needing blockchain as part of a wider technology roadmap.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Large engineering team | Higher pricing |
| Good enterprise experience | Not suitable for simple MVPs |
| Strong integration capabilities | Longer delivery timelines |
| Deep AI and IoT expertise | Less startup focus |
5. PixelPlex
- Location: US, Belarus, Russia
- Established: 2007
- Employees: 200+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Hyperledger Fabric, BSC, Solana
- Cost: 50 to 95 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Enterprises and mid-sized companies
- Flexibility: High.
PixelPlex has deep expertise in smart contracts, tokenization, and DApp ecosystems. They have delivered major blockchain products across supply chain, finance, gaming, and identity platforms. With over a decade of experience, PixelPlex has a strong engineering team capable of both public and private blockchain implementations.
Their architecture approach is structured and reliable. Many clients note the company’s strength in security and long-term system stability.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Deep blockchain expertise | Higher mid-range pricing |
| Strong security and audit skills | Time zone challenges for some clients |
| Reliable delivery | Communication gaps noted in some large programs |
| Good enterprise focus | Limited innovation beyond established stacks |
6. Altoros
- Location: US, Belarus
- Established: 2001
- Employees: 300+
- Core Strength: Hyperledger Fabric, Ethereum, Corda
- Cost: 60 to 100 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Enterprises and regulated industries
- Flexibility: Moderate.
Altoros delivers enterprise blockchain with strong focus on compliance, security, and performance. They integrate blockchain with cloud computing, AI, and IoT. The company is also well recognized for its experience with private blockchain networks and consortia.
Their engineering team has deep domain expertise in finance, logistics, and large-scale enterprise ecosystems. Altoros emphasizes sustainable architecture and long-term system performance.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent enterprise capabilities | Higher pricing |
| Integration with cloud and AI | Not startup-friendly |
| Strong compliance and security | Slow response times reported |
| Mature engineering practices | Limited Web3 innovation |
7. Unicsoft
- Location: UK, USA
- Established: 2006
- Employees: 100+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, EOS
- Cost: 35 to 60 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Startups, SMEs, mid-sized companies
- Flexibility: High.
Unicsoft focuses heavily on smart contracts, NFT ecosystems, and DeFi platforms. Their engineering team builds scalable Web3 products for startups and mid-sized businesses. They are known for transparent delivery, strong communication, and stable technical work.
Unicsoft emphasizes rapid delivery cycles and predictable execution. Their combination of price and quality makes them attractive for early-stage companies.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Very competitive pricing | Smaller team for enterprise projects |
| Strong in NFTs and DeFi | Limited multi-industry presence |
| Good communication | More Web3-focused than enterprise-focused |
| Fast delivery | Less work on private blockchains |
8. ChainSafe
- Location: Canada
- Established: 2017
- Employees: 50+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Polkadot, Filecoin, Cosmos
- Cost: 70 to 140 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Web3 infrastructure projects, protocols
- Flexibility: Moderate.
ChainSafe is a respected name in Web3 infrastructure development. The company works on protocol-level engineering, including Ethereum clients, cross-chain interoperability, and decentralized storage.
Their strongest value is their open-source contributions. Many of their engineers build tools used by blockchain developers worldwide. ChainSafe is a great match for companies building new blockchain protocols, next-generation infrastructure, or highly technical Web3 products.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong protocol expertise | High pricing for startups |
| Major open-source contributor | Not ideal for enterprise systems |
| Excellent decentralization skills | Small team size |
| Great transparency | Focused on technical R&D, not UI UX |
9. Kovench
- Location: USA
- Established: Mid-2010s
- Employees: 50+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Solana
- Cost: 40 to 80 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Startups, small businesses, innovation projects
- Flexibility: High.
Kovench focuses on Web3 applications, token development, and DeFi tools. Their approach is flexible, modular, and suitable for rapid prototyping. The company is agile and responsive, making them attractive for early-stage projects.
Their solution range is narrower, but their development speed and adaptability make them useful for companies looking for fast delivery and creative blockchain ideas.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Fast development cycles | Smaller technical scope |
| Great for early-stage products | Limited enterprise experience |
| Strong token and DApp skills | Pricing varies widely |
| Highly flexible | Less structured process |
10. Empirica
- Location: Poland
- Established: Early 2010s
- Employees: 50–100
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Hyperledger, Stellar
- Cost: 45 to 85 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Financial institutions
- Flexibility: Moderate.
Empirica specializes in financial blockchain applications. Their services cover trading engines, digital asset management, tokenization, and equity processing. They have strong domain knowledge and experience implementing blockchain within regulated environments.
Empirica is a strong choice for businesses needing secure financial-grade blockchain systems or fintech software development solutions.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Strong financial expertise | Niche market focus |
| Good engineering quality | Small global footprint |
| Reliable delivery | Not suitable for non-financial projects |
| Secure systems | Limited platform diversity |
11. Newwave Solutions
- Location: Hanoi, Vietnam
- Established: 2011
- Employees: 300+
- Core Strength: Ethereum, Binance Smart Chain, Hyperledger, Solana
- Cost: 25 to 45 USD per hour
- Suitable For: Startups, SMEs, and enterprises needing reliable offshore delivery
- Flexibility: Very high.
Newwave Solutions is one of Vietnam’s top providers of blockchain development services, with strong capabilities in Web3 applications, smart contracts, token development, and enterprise blockchain. The team has experience across multiple industries including finance, real estate, gaming, and supply chain.
Blockchain technology experts and consultants at Newwave Solutions are familiar with different types of blockchain programming languages and platforms, and above all, they understand the pain points and goals of each business to create custom tailor-made solutions.
The company emphasizes scalability, secure development, and long-term product support. With more than 300 engineers, Newwave Solutions delivers high-quality outcomes while keeping costs optimized. The team follows ISO 27001 and modern Agile processes. This makes them a dependable partner for companies seeking high-quality blockchain developers within a balanced budget.
| Pros | Cons |
|---|---|
| Excellent price-to-quality ratio | Less known than US/EU providers |
| Strong blockchain architecture skills | Limited presence in Western markets |
| Scalable engineering team | Requires clear requirements for best results |
| Good for both startups and enterprises | Time zone differences for some clients |
How to choose the best choice for your project?
Selecting the right blockchain development partner requires understanding your business needs, budget, and technical expectations. Each company in this list provides strong skills in Blockchain Technology, but not all are suitable for every use case. Some companies focus on Web3 innovation, while others prioritize enterprise-grade blockchain development.
A good selection process begins with clarity. You need to know what you want to build, who the target users are, and what blockchain platform aligns with your strategy. You should also understand the cost of blockchain development to avoid misalignment between expectations and real-world engineering work.
What to evaluate?
Technical Competency
- Experience with your required blockchain platform
- Ability to build secure smart contracts
- Cross-chain and interoperability knowledge
- Understanding of consensus mechanisms
- Architecture design and audit capabilities
Industry Fit
- Experience in your business domain (finance, supply chain, healthcare, etc.)
- Familiarity with regulatory requirements
- Prior delivery of industry-specific blockchain apps
Pricing Transparency
- Clear breakdown of the cost of blockchain development
- Flexible models: fixed price, dedicated team, milestone-based
- No hidden operational fees
Delivery Maturity
- Project governance structure
- Agile methodology
- CI/CD and quality assurance
- Post-launch support
Tips for Selecting the Right Company
- Choose enterprise vendors for high-security and mission-critical systems
- Pick mid-range companies for balanced cost vs performance
- Choose startup-focused agencies if you need a fast MVP
- Always request code samples and review smart contract quality
- Check their blockchain audits and penetration testing experience
- Verify team seniority—not just company brand
- Choose multi-chain experts if you expect future expansion
- Evaluate communication skills to ensure smooth execution
- Ask about maintenance, scaling, and governance planning
These steps help ensure you choose the top blockchain development company that fits your technical and business requirements.
Conclusion
Blockchain is no longer a niche technology. It has become the foundation for secure digital processes, decentralized operations, and next-generation automation. Choosing from the top blockchain development companies requires understanding your project goals, the right blockchain platform, your industry requirements, and your long-term scaling strategy.
All companies listed here deliver strong capabilities—but the right fit depends on budget, complexity, and desired outcomes.
If you’re looking for an experienced, cost-efficient, and flexible partner, Newwave Solutions offers full-cycle blockchain development services tailored to your needs. Our team in Vietnam brings deep technical expertise, strong English communication, and competitive pricing across Ethereum, Hyperledger, Solana, BSC, and custom chains—making us one of the best-value partners for both startups and enterprises. For more details of our potentials in your blockchain project, visit Our Portfolio for emerging technology solutions for the best view.
Whether you are exploring blockchain technology, building your first prototype, or scaling to a global system, we help you deliver faster, safer, and more affordably than most Western vendors.
Start your project with Newwave Solutions today—your trusted partner in blockchain innovation, emerging technology solutions, and scalable IT outsourcing services.
To Quang Duy is the CEO of Newwave Solutions, a leading Vietnamese software company. He is recognized as a standout technology consultant. Connect with him on LinkedIn and Twitter.
Read More Guides
Get stories in your inbox twice a month.
Let’s Connect
Let us know what you need, and out professionals will collaborate with you to find a solution that enables growth.
Leave a Reply